|
Europhysics
News (2003) Vol. 34 No. 5
The
EUROBALL gamma ray detector array
G. de Angelis1,A. Bracco2 and D. Curien3
1 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali
di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy 2 Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universita’
and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano,Milano,
Italy
3 Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, Strasbourg, France
THE EUROBALL
collaboration is a common effort of several European countries to provide
a forefront experimental facility for nuclear structure research.Using
composite germanium (Ge) counters, the EUROBALL detector is the prototype
of a new generation of gamma-ray detector arrays that has set new limits
to gamma-detector technology and provided a step forward both in basic
research and in applications.As an example of application outside the
nuclear physics domain we should mention the recent discovery by the
NASA probe,Mars Odyssey, of large quantities of hydrogen that most probably
is bound in water under the Mars surface. This evidence was obtained
through neutron and gamma detection, the latter based on the EUROBALL
detector technology (encapsulated g-ray detectors)
—see Fig.1 [1].
The Euroball array consists of 239 Ge crystals geometrically
arranged in order to cover 45 % of the total solid angle.Technical details
are reported in ref. [2]. Installed at two of the main nuclear structure
facilities in Europe, at LNL (Legnaro-Italy) and at IReS-Vivitron (Strasbourg-France),
see fig. 2, it has allowed the investigation of atomic nuclei at extreme
conditions of angular momentum values and of proton/neutron ratios.
|
|
|
Fig 1 Mapping
elements through g-ray detection using
the Mars Odyssey satellite. Neutrons and g-rays
are produced by the interaction of cosmic rays on Mars.The inset
is a portion of the Odyssey g
spectra showing the emission line due to the capture of thermal
neutrons by hydrogen.The g
counter uses the incapsulation technology developed for EUROBALL.
|
This paper will give an overview of the
research activities by selecting a number of examples.We, the authors,
would like to dedicate this article to the memory of our IReS colleague
and good friend Dr. Jean-Pierre Vivien who has untimely and brutally
passed away when this paper was under discussion.
|
|
|
Fig 2 The
EUROBALL gamma ray detector array, presently at IReS (F), has
been previously operated at LNL (I). Parts of the detector will
be reassembled at GSI (D) for being used with beams of radioactive
ions (RISING project) and at LNL (I) coupled to a magnetic spectrometer
(PRISMA) to exploit the high intensity stable beams provided by
the accelerator complex of the laboratory.The remaining detectors
will move to JYFL, Jyväskylä (Finland) to complement the Jurogam
array.
|
Why
study nuclei at extreme conditions?
The atomic nucleus is the paradigm of a mesoscopic system (finite many-body
system) of strongly interacting Fermions where quantal size effects
play a central role.Renormalization effects for the nucleon-nucleon
interaction are strongly boosted by making the system more polarizable,
that is less bound.A detailed investigation of the nuclear structure
of nuclei at extreme conditions, both at the limit of angular momentum
and of isotopic spin (neutron/ proton ratio) where specific parts of
the nuclear forces are strongly amplified, allows definitive tests to
be carried out on the effective interaction acting between nucleons
in nuclei. These studies provide the basis for a first principle description
of the nuclear structure and are necessary to set stringent limits on
fundamental symmetry-violation effects and on the lifetimes of rare
processes.With an experimental sensitivity up to 10-5 of the production
cross section, such as that of Euroball, it has been possible to provide
an unprecedented study of the nuclear properties under extreme conditions
by addressing a number of problems concerning high spins and nuclei
far from stability.
Nuclear Structure
at the limits of the angular momentum
Through the response of the nucleus to rotational stress one can investigate
a wide variety of nuclear structure phenomena showing the different
facets of a finite fermionic system. In spite of the fact that rotating
nuclei have been studied since the early 50’s, many new phenomena have
been encountered and open questions still remain in this field. Particularly
intriguing is the existence of very elongated nuclear shapes and the
appearance of new degrees of freedom (unusual symmetries like tetrahedral
or octahedral) [3].
|
|
|
Fig 3 Potential
energy surface as a function of the quadrupole deformation, (b2
cos(30+g))
and (b2 sin(30+g)),
calculated for the very elongated structures in 152Dy.One
notices the very pronounced minima corresponding to superdeformed
(SD) and hyperdeformed (HD) shapes coexisting with the normal
deformed (ND) shape of the nucleus.
|
The stabilization of very exotic shapes at high angular
momentum not only provides unique information on the detailed structure
of the nuclear potential but also allows one to infer the underlying
symmetries characterizing the dynamical system. Breaking of the rotational
symmetry can be related to asymmetries in charge distribution (related
to deformed shapes as for macroscopic objects) or to current (only quantal)
distribution. The most common are prolate elongated axial-symmetric
shapes. Prolate axial-symmetric structures with approximately 2:1 and
3:1 axis ratios are called super- (SD) and hyper- (HD) deformed—see
figure 3. For these highly deformed structures, information on the properties
and the behavior of the nucleus is contained in a cascade of about thirty
gamma-rays emitted as it de-excites to its ground state from the highly
excited state in which it was produced.With the EUROBALL array, designed
to pick out high multiplicity cascades of g-rays,
discrete nuclear states up to the fission limit have been identified.
Beyond the region of discrete states, studies of the high-spin quasi-continuum
have brought information on the order-chaos transitions. In particular,
in connection with superdeformation,which has become one of the areas
at the forefront in nuclear structure, the problems of the feeding and
decay-out of the SD bands have attracted particular interest. Concerning
the problem of the feeding of superdeformed configurations, it is important
to mention that indications on the g-decay
of the giant dipole resonance built on SD excited states have been recently
obtained [4]. Below we describe in more detail results showing the first
evidence for non-axially-symmetric superdeformed shapes and the status
for the search for hyperdeformation.
Triaxiality and
wobbling motion
Nuclei when rotating may also develop shapes in which the axial symmetry
is broken [5]. In contrast to the region around the ground states where
deformed nuclei are known to be of axialsymmetric quadrupole type, at
high spin, because of the effect of the Coriolis and centrifugal forces,
one expects a considerable deviation from the axial-symmetric shapes—see
figure 4. In principle any elongated nucleus can be treated as a quantum
rotor that can be brought into rotational motion in a nuclear reaction.
In a quantum description only discrete energy values can be associated
with the rotational motion, the lowest energy usually corresponding
to the most regular rotation. For an even-even elongated nucleus such
a rotation corresponds to the direction of angular momentum that is
perpendicular to the geometrical elongation axis.Any further intrinsic
excitation of the system must lead to a perturbation of such a regularity
and in particular some excited individual-nucleons that tend to align
their angular momenta with the axis of collective rotation R will necessarily
influence the original regularity of the motion: the regularity will
be lost.A classical image of such a situation is known from the studies
of the rigid top that,under specific initial conditions,produces characteristic
precession phenomena.Generally one may associate the word “wobbling”with
the forms of the motion accompanying such excitations.
|
|
|
Fig 4 Pictorial
representation of a triaxial nucleus: a shape like a kiwi fruit.
|
It represents a small amplitude fluctuation of the
rotational axis away from the principal axis such as a precession motion
with the largest moment of inertia,which translates into the “zigzag”
pattern of the gamma transition probabilities. This wobbling mode is
similar to another collective mode—the g
vibration— associated with the transition from an axially symmetric
to a triaxial mean field in the non-rotating case. Excitations of the
wobbling mode was predicted long ago and have recently been identified
due to the high sensitivity of EUROBALL [6,7].
Search for hyperdeformation
The nuclear many-body system may, under the influence of rotational
induced forces, develop various exotic shapes.Most appealing is the
strongly elongated, axially symmetric hyperdeformed (HD) shape with
principal axis ratio 3:1, which is predicted in different regions but
is still not fully experimentally identified.Much emphasis has been
devoted to studies of the interplay between reaction dynamics,binding
energies and fission barriers to optimize the population of HD structures
at the limits of reachable angular momentum.Nuclei in mass regions where
experiments are ongoing are Ba,Xe and Sn.Traces of structures in the
decay pattern which are presumably generated by nuclei of very elongated
shapes were recently observed-see Fig. 5.
In figure 5 an energy matrix of g–g
coincidences is sliced on a plane orthogonal to the main diagonal. In
such a representation g-ray cascades with
a definite moment of inertia appear as a pair of energy peaks equally
spaced (modulus an integer number) with respect to the main diagonal
(ridge structure). The distance between such peaks (shown by the arrows
and corresponding to 2nW equal to 105 (n=1), or to 210 (n=2), is proportional
to the moment of inertia (here J ~ 75 2MeV-1).
Such a value of the moment of inertia corresponds to a 3:1 axis ratio.Ongoing
experimental work is expected to clarify better the existence and nature
of these structures. In fact, the problem of hyperdeformation remains
open also in view of the fact that another possible explanation for
the observed weak ridge structure could be related to an oblate-prolate
phase shape transition (called a Jacobi transition) predicted by the
liquid drop model at the highest spins.
Cluster and molecular
structures in nuclei
Very elongated shapes are also predicted in light nuclei.The most exotic
examples involve a-particles and 12C
or 16O clusters as substructures. The existence of cluster
deformed shapes is deduced mainly from the observation, in light symmetric
systems, of resonances in binary reaction channels. Such molecular structures
also give rise to exotic shapes like reflection asymmetric molecular
structures and to strongly deformed isomeric states consisting of clusters
and loosely bound neutrons in multi-centre orbits [8].
|
|
|
Fig 5 Gamma
spectra of 126Ba obtained requiring coincidences of
equally spaced gamma-rays (Ex-Ey=k).The presence of peaks in the
red top spectrum, after filtering on highfold events, is here
a signature of rotational structures with constant moment of inertia.The
moment of inertia can be deduced by the energy separation of the
pairs of peaks. It is compatible with a 3:1 axis ratio and is
a possible indication of HD structure at high angular momentum.
|
Breaking the rotational
symmetry by current distributions
Until recently it was thought that near-spherical nuclei always emitted
irregular patterns of g-rays.However,very
regular patterns in the energies of g-ray
cascades—and hence possible evidence for rotation—were detected in nuclei
that were known to be almost perfect spheres [9]. For these cases most
of the angular momentum of the nucleus is generated by just a few of
the valence protons and neutrons,whose coupling is governed by the overlap
of the wave-functions that represent the distribution of nucleon density
in the nucleus. Their configuration can be thought of as an unisotropic
arrangement of crossed “current”loops embedded in the spherical mass
distribution of the nucleus—figure 6.An orientation axis is defined
along the total angular momentum vector, J, and the system can
rotate about this axis. This behavior, investigated also at the EUROBALL
spectrometer [10], has been termed “magnetic rotation”because the rotational
sequences of states (and transitions) arise from the anisotropy of currents
in the nucleus, which produce a magnetic moment [11]. In comparison,
the more familiar rotation of deformed nuclei (and molecules) could
be named “electric rotation”to reflect the fact that it results from
an anisotropy in the charge (and mass) distribution.
|
|
|
Fig 6 (Left)
crossed current loops generated by proton particles and neutron
hole configurations.The breaking of the rotational symmetry of
the nucleus by such unisotropic current distributions appears
through regular rotation-like gamma spectra. (Right) Pictorial
view of a triaxial nucleus showing the symmetry operation (P)
related to chiral symmetry breaking, time reversal (T) and finite
rotation (R), which result in a doublet splitting (same spin and
parities) of the rotational states. The inset depicts orbitals
of a high-j proton particle and a high-j neutron hole coupled
to the triaxial density distribution. (picture by courtesy of
S. Frauendorf.)
|
A related topic is the spontaneous chiral symmetry
breaking (giving rise to left- and right-handed systems as in molecules)
which has been discovered in odd-odd nuclei having triaxial shapes.
It is based on the fact that three spatial orientations are different,
namely configurations where the angular momentum vectors, i) of the
valence proton, ii) of the valence neutron and iii) of the core rotation,
are mutually perpendicular. Such angular momentum vectors can form a
left- and a right-handed system, related by the chiral operator,which
combines time reversal and rotation by 180degree.Spontaneous chiral
symmetry breaking in the body-fixed frame is manifested in the laboratory
frame as almost degenerate doublets of gamma transitions in DI=1
(P=1) bands—see right hand side of figure 6.
Nuclear Structure
at the limits of the isotopic spin
The most critical quantities in determining the predicted properties
of a nucleus from a given effective interaction, is the overall number
of nucleons and the ratio N/Z of neutrons to protons. It is the extremes
in these quantities,which define the limits of existence for nuclear
matter. This new field of research in nuclear physics will be opened
up by the second generation radioactive beam accelerators. In the case
of nuclei not too far away from the valley of stability, there is the
possibility to investigate them using high intensity beams of stable
ions in combination with very effi- cient detectors. A large part of
the EUROBALL experimental program has been dedicated to the investigation
of the structure of proton-rich nuclei through a large variety of dedicated
ancillary detectors for reaction products.
Selfconjugate
nuclei and mirror symmetries
Isospin symmetry is a consequence of the approximate charge invariance
of the nucleon—nucleon forces. The isospin symmetry explains the nearly
identical energy spectra observed in pairs of mirror nuclei. The main
contribution to the isospin symmetry breaking is the Coulomb interaction.
Although the symmetry is already broken to some extent, at the level
of the strong interaction, and to a much larger extent by electromagnetic
forces, the isospin formalism remains a very powerful tool.
Isospin symmetry allows one to relate the properties
of corresponding levels in different nuclei, from which complementary
information can be derived on the structure of the nuclear wave function.The
energy differences of analog states along rotational bands in mirror
nuclei—mirror energy difference (MED)—have been investigated in the
last few years in the f7/2-shell in the mass region
between A = 40-60 and for heavier nuclei. By resorting to large scale
shell model calculations the mechanism of the backbending in rotating
mirror nuclei has been related to the MED and explained in terms of
the alignment of like-nucleon pairs— see figure 7. It has also been
shown that the MED gives information on the evolution of nuclear radii
along the yrast bands and provides direct evidence for charge-symmetry
breaking of the nuclear field [12].
|
|
|
Fig 7 (Left)
excited states of 50Fe -50Cr mirror
nuclei investigated with EUROBALL. (Right) The upper part
of the figure shows the measured (Exp) and calculated (SM) energy
differences for mirror nuclei as a function of the angular momentum.The
maximum of the curve indicates an alignment process of a pair
of nucleons.The lower part of the figure shows the average number
of proton pairs in the maximal aligned configuration (by Shell
Model calculations).
|
Isospin Symmetry
The consistency of the standard model for electro-weak interaction can
be checked through the unitarity test of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa
(CMK) matrix.New data,based on super-allowed Fermi b-decay rates, suggest
that the CMK-matrix fails the unitarity test, pointing to physics beyond
the Standard Model. These conclusions partly rely on calculations of
the corrections for nuclear isospin purity of heavy N=Z nuclei. The
size of the isospin mixing in low energy nuclear states has recently
been determined in the mass A 60
region through the precise measurement of the strength of isospin forbidden
gamma transitions, namely E1 decays in N=Z nuclei [13].
Shell stability
and shell evolutions
Magic numbers of nucleons are fundamental quantities in nuclear structure.
They have been determined on the basis of experimental information on
nuclei in or near the valley of b-stability.
Recently, in connection with the development of radioactive beam facilities,
the question has been raised if the same magic numbers persist far from
the stability line. 10050Sn50 is the
heaviest particlebound doubly-magic nucleus with equal number of protons
and neutrons.This system and the nuclei in its vicinity provide a unique
opportunity to study the interaction of protons and neutrons in a many-body
system [14].Along the Z=50 isotopes the evolution of nuclear properties
as the neutron number increases is of extremely high interest, especially
when approaching the other limit, the neutron drip line, close to 150Sn,
after which nuclei are no longer bound. A related topic is the spin-orbit
splitting of the mean-field orbitals and its dependence on a more diffuse
nuclear surface. If it changes for neutron rich nuclei, this could strongly
influence the magic numbers for nuclei far from the stability line.Radioactive
ion beams will therefore play a very important role in investigating
nuclear properties far from stability. Spectroscopic studies of neutron-rich
nuclei not very far from the stability line can at the moment also be
performed through deep inelastic reactions,where several nucleons are
interchanged between projectile and target. Information has been obtained
with EUROBALL by using g-ray coincidences
between the two partners (target- and projectile-like) for the identification
of unknown g-decays.
Future perspectives
with gamma detector arrays
Present gamma detector arrays are already very sophisticated instruments
able to search for very weak reaction channels.New perspectives in the
field of nuclear structure will be opened both by the use of high intensity
beams of stable ions combined with an increasing selectivity of the
instrument, as well as by the availability of moderately intense beams
of radioactive ions. The combined use of g-ray
detector arrays and of magnetic spectrometers for reaction channel selection
has been successfully exploited in the past and will be further developed
at Jyväskylä in Finland and at LNL where EUROBALL detectors will be
used to study the level structure of exotic nuclei identified respectively
by the RITU gas filled separator and by the PRISMA magnetic spectrometer.
Nuclear Structure
perspectives using high intensity beams of stable ions
High intensity beams of stable ions offer an interesting possibility
to extend our knowledge of nuclear structure both for proton-rich and
moderately neutron-rich nuclei.Quasi-elastic or multi-nucleon transfer
reactions can be used to populate moderate neutron-rich nuclei along
shell closures where nuclear structure calculations predict radical
changes in the shell structure. Particularly powerful is the combination
of large-acceptance high-resolution magnetic spectrometers with highly
segmented Ge detector arrays.An high granularity of the g-ray
detector array provides for a good g-energy
resolution allowing a proper treatment of the Doppler effect.A system
combining the new magnetic spectrometer (PRISMA) with the composite
Ge detectors (Clovers) of EUROBALL is now coming into operation at LNL
in Italy using the high intensity stable ion beams of the accelerator
complex (PIAVE-ALPI).
Radioactive ion
beams and gamma spectroscopy
The use of beams of unstable ions will finally allow nuclear structure
studies for the most exotic systems.We should mention here the future
EUROBALL detector campaign at GSI (Germany), the Rising project. Gamma-ray
spectroscopy of nuclei from exotic beams will be performed after in-flight
isotope separation. The exotic beams will be produced by fragmentation
of heavy stable primary beams or by fission of a 238U beam
on a 9Be or 208Pb target and then selected by
the fragment separator. Other g-ray detector
arrays are now starting operation at radioactive ion beam facilities
such as Spiral (Ganil,France) or Rex-isolde (CERN, Switzerland).
Increasing the
sensitivity of germanium-detector arrays by g-ray
tracking
Gamma-ray detector arrays of the present generation are built of Compton-suppressed
Ge-detectors arranged in tightly packed spherical configurations.High
granularity (and large distances from the target position) is needed
for an efficient Doppler shift correction.
This is achieved by rejecting the signal from the
detector when the surrounding BGO scintillator shield detects g-rays
that are Compton scattered out of the Ge crystal. It is now the common
view that in order to make the next major advance, the suppression shields
have to be replaced by active Ge detectors.The major problem here is
the uncontrollable Compton scattering.A solution is that all g-ray
interaction paths need to be tracked and characterized—see figure 8.
|
|
|
Fig 8 A
Compton scattering event inside a Ge detector having three interaction
points.Tracking of the gamma ray can be achieved through precise
measurements of energy deposit and position at each interaction
point. Digital electronics and pulse shape analysis are therefore
essential.The tracking reconstruction efficiency, and therefore
the total efficiency of the system, will be strongly dependent
on the position resolution, which can be brought to few millimeters.
|
The recent advances in crystal segmentation technology
and digital signal processing have opened the possibility to operate
the detectors in a position-sensitive mode with high counting rates.
This enables the design of a compact array solely out of Ge detectors
omitting the BGO shields (Advanced GAmma ray Tracking
Array). It is expected from simulations that an array consisting
of a limited number (~ 50 - 100) of such detectors can have unprecedented
features: an efficiency of up to ~ 40% while maintaining a signal over
noise-ratio of the order of 60%. Therefore by using the tracking technique
one expects to improve the array sensitivity by about two orders of
magnitude over the current generation of Ge-arrays. A wide European
collaboration is now progressing in this way [15].
References
[1] Boynton et al., Science 297 (5578):81 R24 and http://grs.lpl.arizona.edu
[2] J.Simpson, Z. Phys A358 (1997)139
[3] NewScientist, 8 June 2002, page 7 and J.Dudek et al. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 88 (2002) 252502
[4] G.Benzoni et al., Phys. Lett. B 540 (2002) 199
[5] S.Toermaenen et al., Phys. Lett. B 454 (1999) 8
[6] S.W.Ødegård et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5866
[7] D.R. Jensen et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 142503
[8] W. von Oertzen, Eur. Phys. J.A11 (2001) 403
[9] G. Baldsiefen et al.,Nucl. Phys. A 574 (1994) 521
[10] R.M. Lieder et al., Eur. Phys. J.A13 (2002) 297
[11] S. Frauendorf, Nucl. Phys. A 557 (1993) 259c
[12] S. Lenzi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 12250
[13] E. Farnea et al., Phys. Lett. B (2002)
[14] C. Fahlander et al., Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 021307(R)
[15] R. Lieder et al.,Nucl. Phys. A682(2001)279c
Copyright EPS
and EDP Sciences,
2003
|